#Joint strike fighter game sound mod plus

You are an F-35 fanboy without being able to see all sides of the issue. We cannot get there by ensuring American jobs for American workers. Last but not the least - the economy of a nation is dependent on training its own nationals to build a high tech industry at home. It is not as easy as you may think.Ask an aviator.

But in doing that they have to be agile enough to avoid hitting the mountains. A plane in the Himalayas has to stay below the mountaintops to avoid Chinese S-300 clone radar. Combat aircraft are always compromises and there is no guarantee whatsoever that the F-35 will be effective at those altitudes.Īn F-35 carrying external bombs will not be stealthy. The US is designing a fighter for all those partner nations. India is the ONLY country in the world that needs to fight at those altitudes. Delta wings are better suited for that - so the Mirage 200 was better - and it was an air defence fighter modified for ground attack.

#Joint strike fighter game sound mod plus

At 20,000 feet plus aircraft are not maneuverable like they are at lower altitudes. War with China if at all will take places at Kargil like altitudes. Why pay the US for stealth features which will be of no use since we need a 'bomb truck'? If the F 35 has to be stealthy it can carry only 2 bombs internally. That would be a total waste if it carried 7 tons of bombs externally - killing stealth. I see no reason why the F 35 would be diferent.Ī lot of effort has gone into make the F-35 stealthy. You have the prerogative of making a false case.Īll aircraft makers need to make up their investment and will always hype their product which typically will not work as well as advertised. without weapons and topped up fuel - comparative studies in combat configuration have proven that the F-35 outperforms all advanced Gen-4 aircraft in top end speed, loiter, subsonic acceleration and radius, besting them comfortably in aerial combat at shorter and long ranges.Ījay you are wrong on many counts. While the Gen-4 fighters handle well in “air show” configuration - i.e. Even though air-to-air combat is a secondary role for the F-35, US Air Force simulations (and remember, that is the most demanding of customers) have concluded that the F-35 is at least 6 times better in aerial combat than even advanced fourth-generation fighters. While I do not subscribe to the “multi-role” school of thought, the facts appear to indicate that the F-35 can hold its own in air-to-air combat as well. MMRCA contenders in New Delhi have been assiduously putting out the word that the F-35, with its orientation towards its strike role, is poorly equipped to fend off enemy fighters that would intercept it before it could reach its target.